
Review
Tamron 35–150 mm f/2–2.8: a miracle, or just an expensive zoom?
I test one of the most unusual zooms on the market. Will the Tamron 35–150 mm f/2–2.8 replace a set of primes, or do you pay for its performance with too much weight?
If you shoot with just one lens in your bag, you know how choosing a focal length always ends up as a compromise. Either you go with a versatile 24–70 mm, or you carry two primes and keep swapping between them.
The Tamron 35–150 mm f/2–2.8 Di III VXD comes with an ambitious promise: to be the one lens that handles everything. Is that realistic, or just marketing with a high price tag? After months of use at various events, here's my hands-on take.
An unusual zoom range
The range starts at 35 mm, a moderate wide angle, and ends at 150 mm, a proper portrait telephoto. What's missing, though, is 24 mm, which is essential for landscapes or cramped interiors. If you need a wide-angle shot, you'll have to pack another lens.
On the other hand, the 35–150 mm range is huge. For a documentary photographer who quickly alternates between details and wider shots, it's a big win – no need to change lenses every five minutes. In rain or dust, where changing lenses isn't a good idea, that's a big advantage.
f/2 at 35 mm
This is where the real magic begins. The aperture does vary from f/2 at the wide end to f/2.8 at the long end, but even so the lens is faster than typical zooms across its whole range. At 35 mm you have a lot of light available, which is key for indoor portraits or evening street photography.
The combination of 35 mm and f/2 offers an interesting mix of closeness and subject separation. You can photograph people up close and still have a nicely blurred background. The fast aperture lets you keep ISO low even in dim light, which matters in fast-paced documentary work. Focusing is quiet and accurate.
Portraits at 150 mm
At the long end you enter territory that portrait photographers love. A 150 mm focal length on full frame strongly compresses perspective: the background is “pulled” toward the subject, faces look natural and details are sharp.
The f/2.8 aperture here is a stop slower than at the wide end, but still bright enough for most situations. If you're used to a 70–200 mm f/2.8, you'll find comparable rendering and bokeh here. The blur is smooth and pleasant, without having to switch to a prime lens.
Weight as the trade-off
You can't talk about this lens without mentioning its weight – it's almost 1.2 kg. Carry it all day and your shoulder will feel it. On a tripod, or when alternating with a lighter lens, it's fine.
The trade-off is clear: you sacrifice lightness for range and aperture. For sports shooters or ultralight travelers it's not the ideal choice. For professionals who move their gear by car and want the reliability of a single lens, it's a great solution.
Who it's for
This lens isn't for everyone, and it's not a replacement for two cheap zooms. It's a tool for professionals and advanced amateurs who want fewer lenses without losing quality. It's for you if:
- you shoot events or documentary work where you can't change lenses
- you need to switch quickly between 35 and 150 mm
- you don't mind carrying heavier gear.
If you're a beginner who just wants to stroll around the city, choose a lighter 24–105 mm. For landscapes you'll miss 24 mm.
Conclusion
The Tamron 35–150 mm f/2–2.8 isn't a miracle that changes everything, but it's a very strong tool for specific needs. It works if you accept its limits and its weight. In practice I realized that one lens in hand is often more efficient than constant swapping. If you're looking for one lens that won't hold you back in this range, it's one of the best options on the market.
